Paul Perry & I had this conversation the other day: if an entertainer is past their prime, should they still be "entertaining"? We agreed, yes, if they still enjoy it, why not.
I went to see Chuck Berry at Berklee a few Sunday nights ago. I've always maintained Chuck is the king of rock and roll...sorry Elvis fans...but it's Chuck...and Little Richard that, in my opinion, ushered in the best era EVA!
The loose, raucous, wild, loud, sexual, sensual, freeing sound of rock and roll....and you know it when you're in it's presence. There are a lot of artists that some people attempt to convince us are rock and roll that are not rock and roll. Keith Richards, Grace Slick, Tom Petty, John Lennon: rock and roll......Madonna, Michael Jackson: not.
So why are the latter in the Rock & Roll Hall of Fame? Good question. Regardless, Chuck Berry, at 81 years of age, put on a great show. His guitar playing and vocals sounded as rich and frisky as ever. Though nowhere near his prime, it was a joy to hear and see rock and roll incarnate and I hope he plays until he moves on to his next assignment.
Long live rock.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
I bet seeing Chuck Berry was amazing. That opening riff from Johnny B Good is what inspired me to learn guitar. Many bands have gotten better with age.. especially the Allmans. Look at BB King who still tours despite the fact hes 82 years old. You have to imagine at this point its not the money its just the enjoyment of playing.. the mark of a pure musician
I've also had fortune to see Chuck live and yes I agree he is the "KING".
Don't know where you were this past week, but I don't think I can last in the midday without you talking in my head all day. You are missed.
Post a Comment